lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-id: <20080123224010.GF18433@webber.adilger.int> Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 15:40:10 -0700 From: Andreas Dilger <adilger@....com> To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....EDU>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, girish@...sterfs.com, adilger@...sterfs.com, shaggy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, cmm@...ibm.com, "linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 33/49] ext4: Add the journal checksum feature On Jan 23, 2008 14:07 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > +{ > > + struct page *page = bh->b_page; > > + char *addr; > > + __u32 checksum; > > + > > + addr = kmap_atomic(page, KM_USER0); > > + checksum = crc32_be(crc32_sum, > > + (void *)(addr + offset_in_page(bh->b_data)), bh->b_size); > > + kunmap_atomic(addr, KM_USER0); > > + > > + return checksum; > > +} > > Can this buffer actually be in highmem? Yes, this was found during system testing. While ext3/4 will only allocate buffer heads in lowmem, the jbd/jbd2 code can allocate buffers in highmem. I was surprised about this also. Please see the thread in ext4-devel: [PATCH][RFC]JBD2: Fix journal checksum kernel oops on NUMA Cheers, Andreas -- Andreas Dilger Sr. Staff Engineer, Lustre Group Sun Microsystems of Canada, Inc. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists