| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <47DA87EF.6040405@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 09:13:03 -0500 From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com> To: Theodore Tso <tytso@....EDU> CC: Matthias Koenig <mkoenig@...e.de>, ext4 development <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] e2fsprogs- fix ext2fs_swap_inode_full attr test on BE boxes Theodore Tso wrote: > This patch is in the repo, which I thought superceded the one which > Eric sent. (The authorship is wrong; and that was my fault for not > including '--author="Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>"' on the commit > command-line. I've already apologized to Eric privately; now I'm > apologizing publically. :-) And I've realized that I really should start using git to make it easier on Ted. :) > But looking at it again, I believe I misunderstood, and the two > patches are attacking quite separate problems. OK, i'll get this one > in as well in the next go-around. Yep, there were 2 problems. One was that inode_scan_and_fix() wasn't moving all of large inodes. The other was that ext2fs_swap_inode_full was doing bad things for in-inode attrs on big endian boxes, that was the patch in this thread which isn't in the repo yet, but is in fact needed. I suppose that the iterative nature of my fix for this problem didn't help Ted keep things straight, sorry. -Eric -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists