linux-ext4 - Entries in feature

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <1206603634.3379.4.camel@alpha.linsyssoft.com>
Date:	Thu, 27 Mar 2008 13:10:34 +0530
From:	Girish Shilamkar <Girish.Shilamkar@....COM>
To:	Ext4 Mailing List <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:	Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
Subject: Entries in feature_list[]

Hi,
In e2fsprogs/lib/e2p/feature.c 
struct feature feature_list[] contains:
        ... 
	{       E2P_FEATURE_INCOMPAT, EXT3_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_EXTENTS,
                        "extents" },
        {       E2P_FEATURE_INCOMPAT, EXT2_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_META_BG,
                        "meta_bg" }
        {       E2P_FEATURE_INCOMPAT, EXT3_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_EXTENTS,
                        "extent" },
        ...

Is the { E2P_*, EXT3_*, "extent"} entry correct one, if yes, what is the purpose behind having two
{E2P_FEATURE_INCOMPAT, EXT3_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_EXTENTS, *} entries, unless we want "extent" to be 
correct feature ?


Thanks,
Girish

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html