linux-ext4 - Re: 2.6.25-rc8-mm2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20080411212222.b3c1177e.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Fri, 11 Apr 2008 21:22:22 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.25-rc8-mm2

On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 16:40:36 +0300 Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org> wrote:

> On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 08:33:54PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >...
> > Changes since 2.6.25-rc8-mm1:
> >...
> > +ext4-is-busted-on-m68k.patch
> > 
> >  ext4 doesn't build on m68k
> >...
> 
> Is this due to the generic_find_next_le_bit compile error I reported as 
> 2.6.25 regression (there seems to be some discussion recently how to 
> fix it - hopefully for 2.6.25) or is there even more breakage in -mm?

Yes, it's the bitops screwup.

I saw some related linux-ext4 email float past yesterday, so something
might be happening.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html