linux-ext4 - Re: 2.6.25-rc8-mm2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080412184317.GB18122@skywalker>
Date:	Sun, 13 Apr 2008 00:13:17 +0530
From:	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-m68k@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.25-rc8-mm2

On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 09:22:22PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 16:40:36 +0300 Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 08:33:54PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > >...
> > > Changes since 2.6.25-rc8-mm1:
> > >...
> > > +ext4-is-busted-on-m68k.patch
> > > 
> > >  ext4 doesn't build on m68k
> > >...
> > 
> > Is this due to the generic_find_next_le_bit compile error I reported as 
> > 2.6.25 regression (there seems to be some discussion recently how to 
> > fix it - hopefully for 2.6.25) or is there even more breakage in -mm?
> 
> Yes, it's the bitops screwup.
> 
> I saw some related linux-ext4 email float past yesterday, so something
> might be happening.
> 

It would really help if we can get some m68k people to look at patch
i posted.

http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.ext4/5944


-aneesh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html