[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080716133407.GT8185@mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 09:34:07 -0400
From: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
To: Andreas Dilger <adilger@....com>
Cc: Gary Hawco <ghawco@....net>,
"linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Add
ext4__allow_read-only_mounts_with_corrupted_block_group_checksums
patch
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 03:29:14AM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> > Rebooted and e2fsck saw errors and did a forced fsck without having to
> > reboot. All is well thus far.
>
> You shouldn't really have rebooted at that point, just run e2fsck on
> the filesystem to clear the checksums.
This was the root filesystem so he couldn't have run e2fsck on the
mounted filesystem.
> > Then I did the reverse: tune2fs -O uninit_bg /dev/sda6 to renable uninit_bg
> > feature. Again, I was prompted to run e2fsck on system.
>
> Again, you should have just run e2fsck on the filesystem without rebooting,
> in order to update the checksums.
Ditto.
> > I was under the impression that the newest patch would handle this or am I
> > mistaken?
>
> We probably need to allow the kernel to mount the filesystem read-only in
> this case in order to run e2fsck.
That's what the patch I added in the latest snapshot was supposed to
do. I admit I haven't had a chance to test it yet, but the code looks
like it should do the right thing. You are sure that you are mounting
the root filesystem read/only (there is "ro" on the boot command line)
and this is the kernel with this patch applied, right?
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists