lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20080816152541.GB8422@mit.edu> Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 11:25:41 -0400 From: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu> To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com> Cc: ext4 development <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>, "Jose R. Santos" <jrs@...ibm.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] ext4: flex_bg ialloc, don't pick "best_flex" with 0 inodes On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 05:01:10PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > It seems like adjusting the following test is a better plan; > for starters I do not see that best_flex can ever be < 0, so Given that ext4_group_t is an unsigned long, that's certainly true. :-) > that test is replaced, and if the current "best" flex group > has no inodes free, and the current one does have room, > it is promoted to the next "best." Looks good to me. I've added it to the patch queue. > Signed-of-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com> (forgot an 'f' :-) Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu> - Ted -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists