linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH, RFC] ext4: flex_bg ialloc, don't pick "best

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <48A70FD6.80709@redhat.com>
Date:	Sat, 16 Aug 2008 12:35:18 -0500
From:	Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
To:	Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
CC:	ext4 development <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Jose R. Santos" <jrs@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] ext4: flex_bg ialloc, don't pick "best_flex" with
 0 inodes

Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 05:01:10PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> It seems like adjusting the following test is a better plan;
>> for starters I do not see that best_flex can ever be < 0, so
> 
> Given that ext4_group_t is an unsigned long, that's certainly true.
> :-)

Heh, that too!

>> that test is replaced, and if the current "best" flex group
>> has no inodes free, and the current one does have room,
>> it is promoted to the next "best."
> 
> Looks good to me.  I've added it to the patch queue.
> 
>> Signed-of-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
> 
> (forgot an 'f' :-)

Urk...

Thanks!

-Eric

> Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
> 
> 					- Ted

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html