[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080920153633.GA6061@shareable.org>
Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2008 16:36:34 +0100
From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@...reable.org>
To: Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>
Cc: Jörn Engel <joern@...fs.org>,
Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, Andreas Dilger <adilger@....com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...uxfoundation.org, Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@...e.com>,
mtk.manpages@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] vfs: vfs-level fiemap interface
Chris Mason wrote:
> > > > For the journal case at least, grub can walk through the log of the FS
> > > > looking for up to date copies of things. It does this already for
> > > > reiserfs because the btree can't be trusted at all without a log replay.
> > OMFG.
>
> Shrug, either we force the user to do something to get the blocks on
> disk in a stable location or we have a bootloader that can parse the
> disk format. It's either pain on the developers (patching grub) or pain
> on every user, and the support people who have to remind them to rerun
> grub-find-the-disk-blocks-just-like-lilo
I think this thread may be confusing /usr/bin/grub with grub the bootloader.
One of the useful features of grub the bootloader is that it can boot
from a real filesystem without needing "run lilo before it's safe to
boot - or you'll regret shutting down".
That feature needs to use some kind of bleeding-eyes filesystem code,
or it will be as large as the filesystem code in Linux.
On the other hand, any dodgy direct access done by /usr/bin/grub has
no justification and is fair game for deletion, imho.
-- Jamie
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists