[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080920154416.GA3834@infradead.org>
Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2008 11:44:16 -0400
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Jamie Lokier <jamie@...reable.org>
Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>, J?rn Engel <joern@...fs.org>,
Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, Andreas Dilger <adilger@....com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...uxfoundation.org, Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@...e.com>,
mtk.manpages@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] vfs: vfs-level fiemap interface
On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 04:36:34PM +0100, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> > Shrug, either we force the user to do something to get the blocks on
> > disk in a stable location or we have a bootloader that can parse the
> > disk format. It's either pain on the developers (patching grub) or pain
> > on every user, and the support people who have to remind them to rerun
> > grub-find-the-disk-blocks-just-like-lilo
>
> I think this thread may be confusing /usr/bin/grub with grub the bootloader.
>
> One of the useful features of grub the bootloader is that it can boot
> from a real filesystem without needing "run lilo before it's safe to
> boot - or you'll regret shutting down".
>
> That feature needs to use some kind of bleeding-eyes filesystem code,
> or it will be as large as the filesystem code in Linux.
If the lilo or grub approach is better is at least debatable, but that's
not really the point here.
> On the other hand, any dodgy direct access done by /usr/bin/grub has
> no justification and is fair game for deletion, imho.
That _is_ the real problem. But we're getting quite offtopic as non
of that is related to FIEMAP anymore ;-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists