[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081006212118.GA382@basil.nowhere.org>
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 23:21:18 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: tytso@....edu, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] EXT4: Avoid double dirtying of super block in ext4_put_super()
EXT4: Avoid double dirtying of super block in ext4_put_super()
While reading code I noticed that ext4_put_super() dirties the
superblock bh twice. It is always done in ext4_commit_super()
too. Remove the redundant dirty operation.
Should be a nop semantically.
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
diff -up linux-2.6.27-rc6-csum/fs/ext4/super.c-o linux-2.6.27-rc6-csum/fs/ext4/super.c
--- linux-2.6.27-rc6-csum/fs/ext4/super.c-o 2008-08-29 10:10:08.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.27-rc6-csum/fs/ext4/super.c 2008-10-06 11:24:31.000000000 +0200
@@ -508,8 +509,6 @@
if (!(sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY)) {
EXT4_CLEAR_INCOMPAT_FEATURE(sb, EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_RECOVER);
es->s_state = cpu_to_le16(sbi->s_mount_state);
- BUFFER_TRACE(sbi->s_sbh, "marking dirty");
- mark_buffer_dirty(sbi->s_sbh);
ext4_commit_super(sb, es, 1);
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists