[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081103011935.GQ8134@mit.edu>
Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 20:19:35 -0500
From: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: cmm@...ibm.com, frederic.bohe@...l.net, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] ext4: Add blocks added during resize to bitmap
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 12:04:25PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> With this change new blocks added during resize
> are marked as free in the block bitmap and the
> group is flagged with EXT4_GROUP_INFO_NEED_INIT_BIT
> flag. This make sure when mballoc tries to allocate
> blocks from the new group we would reload the
> buddy information using the bitmap present in the disk.
Stupid question --- instead of reworking ext4_free_blocks_sb() and
renaming it be to called ext4_add_groupblocks(), and then forcing
mballoc() to reinitialize the block group, why not just have the
resize code call ext4_mb_free_blocks()?
Also I had to make some minor changes to patches 2 and 3 to make them
apply against the latest tree (checked into the patch queue tree). I
also changed calls to ext4_error() to use __func__ so the function
name in used in ext4_add_groupblocks() was correct in patch #1 --- but
I suspect that once you change resize to use ext4_mb_free_blocks(),
ext4_add_groupblocks()/ext4_free_blocks_sb() can go away entirely.
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists