[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090225104446.GA25714@skywalker>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 16:14:46 +0530
From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Kazuya Mio <k-mio@...jp.nec.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: double free of blocks occurred during online defrag
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 03:39:52PM +0900, Kazuya Mio wrote:
> Hi Aneesh,
>
> When I remove the file that is running online defrag, the following error occurs
> after closing the file descriptor:
>
> Jan 22 17:06:52 G3-OPC-SVR2 kernel: EXT4-fs error (device hda8):
> ext4_mb_release_inode_pa: free 2048, pa_free 1562
> Jan 22 17:06:52 G3-OPC-SVR2 kernel: EXT4-fs error (device hda8): mb_free_blocks:
> double-free of inode 0's block 802817(bit 0 in group 98)
> Jan 22 17:06:52 G3-OPC-SVR2 kernel: EXT4-fs error (device hda8): mb_free_blocks:
> double-free of inode 0's block 802818(bit 1 in group 98)
> Jan 22 17:06:52 G3-OPC-SVR2 kernel: EXT4-fs error (device hda8): mb_free_blocks:
> double-free of inode 0's block 802819(bit 2 in group 98)
> Jan 22 17:06:52 G3-OPC-SVR2 kernel: EXT4-fs error (device hda8): mb_free_blocks:
> double-free of inode 0's block 802820(bit 3 in group 98)
> Jan 22 17:06:52 G3-OPC-SVR2 kernel: EXT4-fs error (device hda8): mb_free_blocks:
> double-free of inode 0's block 802821(bit 4 in group 98)
> Jan 22 17:06:52 G3-OPC-SVR2 kernel: EXT4-fs error (device hda8): mb_free_blocks:
> double-free of inode 0's block 802822(bit 5 in group 98)
>
> So, online defrag calls ext4_discard_preallocations() at the end of
> ext4_defrag() to avoid double-free error.
> However, above error hasn't occurred since applying your patch posted on Nov
> 6th, 2008 because this error is caused by the same reason of your report.
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-ext4&m=122599787406193&w=4
>
> What is the status of this patch?
We dropped the patch because I found that the double free in my case was
not exactly due the explanation given in the patch above.
I asked to drop the patch in
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.ext4/10199
I also found that the patch is not completely correct. The meta-data
blocks which are added to the free_list are not allocated from any
prealloc space.
So what you are seeing may be a different problem which the patch is
hiding from happening. I guess you will have to look more closely at why the
double-free is happening in your case.
-aneesh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists