[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.00.0902251150300.4063@vixen.sonytel.be>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 11:50:57 +0100 (CET)
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <Geert.Uytterhoeven@...ycom.com>
To: Mark Nelson <markn@....ibm.com>
cc: linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, Jan Kara <jack@....cz>,
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Crash (ext3 ) during 2.6.29-rc6 boot
On Wed, 25 Feb 2009, Mark Nelson wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 05:01:59 am Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Mon, 23 Feb 2009, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> > > Andrew Morton writes:
> > > > It looks like we died in ext3_xattr_block_get():
> > > >
> > > > memcpy(buffer, bh->b_data + le16_to_cpu(entry->e_value_offs),
> > > > size);
> > > >
> > > > Perhaps entry->e_value_offs is no good. I wonder if the filesystem is
> > > > corrupted and this snuck through the defenses.
> > > >
> > > > I also wonder if there is enough info in that trace for a ppc person to
> > > > be able to determine whether the faulting address is in the source or
> > > > destination of the memcpy() (please)?
> > >
> > > It appears to have faulted on a load, implicating the source. The
> > > address being referenced (0xc00000003f380000) doesn't look
> > > outlandish. I wonder if this kernel has CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC turned
> > > on, and what page size is selected?
> >
> > I'm seeing a similar thing on PS3, but not in ext3. During early userspace
> > setup (udevd), it crashes accessing a 0xc00* address in:
> >
> > | NIP setup+0x20/0x130
> > | LR copy_user_page+0x18/0x6c
> > | Call trace:
> > | do_wp_page+0x5b4/0x89c
> > | do_page_fault+0x3a8/0x58c
> > | handle_page_fault+0x20/0x5c
> >
> > I have CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC=y. If I disable it, the system boots fine.
> >
> > If needed, I can probably bisect this tomorrow. It definitely didn't happen in
> > 2.6.29-rc5.
>
> No need to bisect - it was 25d6e2d7c58ddc4a3b614fc5381591c0cfe66556, my
> commit that "optimised" 64bit memcpy() for Power6 and Cell.
>
> The bug was in -rc1, but if your copies were 8-byte aligned with respect
> to the source the problem wouldn't have been seen... Could this have
> been why you didn't see it in -rc5?
Hmm... I just started seeing it on older kernels (-rc5+), too...
With kind regards,
Geert Uytterhoeven
Software Architect
Sony Techsoft Centre Europe
The Corporate Village · Da Vincilaan 7-D1 · B-1935 Zaventem · Belgium
Phone: +32 (0)2 700 8453
Fax: +32 (0)2 700 8622
E-mail: Geert.Uytterhoeven@...ycom.com
Internet: http://www.sony-europe.com/
A division of Sony Europe (Belgium) N.V.
VAT BE 0413.825.160 · RPR Brussels
Fortis · BIC GEBABEBB · IBAN BE41293037680010
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists