[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090504062138.GH9151@shell>
Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 02:21:38 -0400
From: Valerie Aurora <vaurora@...hat.com>
To: Nick Dokos <nicholas.dokos@...com>
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6][64-bit] __u32 -> __u64 in ba_resize_bmap() and blk_t -> blk64_t in ext2fs_check_desc()
On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 04:47:26AM -0400, Nick Dokos wrote:
> Both of these were found by code inspection while chasing the
> ext2fs_get_free_blocks2() problem. I have not seen a problem arising
> from them, but they look like bugs to me.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nick Dokos <nicholas.dokos@...com>
> ---
> lib/ext2fs/blkmap64_ba.c | 2 +-
> lib/ext2fs/check_desc.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/ext2fs/blkmap64_ba.c b/lib/ext2fs/blkmap64_ba.c
> index f7f7097..b9e0e90 100644
> --- a/lib/ext2fs/blkmap64_ba.c
> +++ b/lib/ext2fs/blkmap64_ba.c
> @@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ static errcode_t ba_resize_bmap(ext2fs_generic_bitmap64 bmap,
> ext2fs_ba_private bp = (ext2fs_ba_private) bmap->private;
> errcode_t retval;
> size_t size, new_size;
> - __u32 bitno;
> + __u64 bitno;
>
> /*
> * If we're expanding the bitmap, make sure all of the new
> diff --git a/lib/ext2fs/check_desc.c b/lib/ext2fs/check_desc.c
> index 6a969e0..e812c9f 100644
> --- a/lib/ext2fs/check_desc.c
> +++ b/lib/ext2fs/check_desc.c
> @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ errcode_t ext2fs_check_desc(ext2_filsys fs)
> dgrp_t i;
> blk64_t first_block = fs->super->s_first_data_block;
> blk64_t last_block = ext2fs_blocks_count(fs->super)-1;
> - blk_t blk, b;
> + blk64_t blk, b;
> int j;
>
> EXT2_CHECK_MAGIC(fs, EXT2_ET_MAGIC_EXT2FS_FILSYS);
> --
> 1.6.0.6
>
Signed-off-by: Valerie Aurora (Henson) <vaurora@...hat.com>
-VAL
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists