[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090511193514.GF21518@mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 15:35:14 -0400
From: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishckin@...il.com>,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Q] ext3 mkfs: zeroing journal blocks
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 01:44:18PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Andreas Dilger wrote:
>
> > The reason that the journal is zeroed is because there is some chance
> > that old (valid at the time) transaction headers and commit blocks might
> > be in the journal and could accidentally be "recovered" and cause bad
> > corruption of the filesystem.
>
> But I guess the question is, why isn't a normal internal log zeroed?
>
> If I'm reading it right only external logs get this treatment, and I
> think that's what generated the original question from Alexander.
Internal journals are indeed cleared. Check out write_journal_inode()
in lib/ext2fs/mkjournal.c, which calls ext2fs_block_iterate() passing
in the callback function mkjournal_proc(), which calls
ext2fs_zero_blocks().
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists