lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090512044719.GB6753@skywalker>
Date:	Tue, 12 May 2009 10:17:19 +0530
From:	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
Cc:	cmm@...ibm.com, sandeen@...hat.com, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ext4: Properly initialize the buffer_head state

On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 11:17:56PM -0400, Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 04:09:28PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> > These buffer_heads are allocated on stack and are
> > used only to make get_blocks calls. So we can set the
> > b_state to 0
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> 
> I've rewritten the commit description to this:
> 
> ext4: Properly initialize the buffer_head state
> 
> From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> 
> These struct buffer_heads are allocated on the stack (and hence are
> initialized with stack garbage).  They are only used to call a
> get_blocks() function, so that's mostly OK, but b_state must be
> initialized to be 0.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
> 
> Comments?
> 

good.

-aneesh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ