lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 10:22:10 +0530 From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> To: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu> Cc: cmm@...ibm.com, sandeen@...hat.com, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] vfs: Add BUG_ON for delayed and unwritten extentsin submit_bh On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 11:17:09PM -0400, Theodore Tso wrote: > On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 04:09:30PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: > > We should not do submit_bh for delayed and unwritten extents. So > > add a BUG_ON on them. > > Hmm, maybe we should add a BUG_ON(buffer_new(bh)) here to? That flag > should never leak out to submit_bh as well, right? > Yes . But since BH_New is used by all the filesystems we need to verify them and make sure other filesystems gets it right. IIUC BH_Delay and BH_Unwritten are only used by ext4, xfs and btrfs -aneesh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists