linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH 3/3] xfstests: fallocate + read/write tests, ext4 regression tests

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090621191732.GB19596@infradead.org>
Date:	Sun, 21 Jun 2009 15:17:32 -0400
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:	Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...deen.net>
Cc:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	ext4 development <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
	xfs-oss <xfs@....sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] xfstests: fallocate + read/write tests, ext4
	regression tests

On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 04:00:27PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:13:22PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> >> New test to test basic mixed fallocate + read & write,
> >> includes a couple regression tests for bugs that ext4
> >> hit.  Uses xfs_io to generate fallocate calls, so requires
> >> git xfsprogs and very recent glibc at this point.
> >
> > Looks good to me, and again does the correct notrun for my 32-bit
> > VM.  Guess I need to do the raw syscall wireup i xfsprogs eventually..
> 
> I don't mind doing it either ... how many arches? :)

Most important is x86 I think.  arm might be the other really important
candidate.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html