[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090820024419.GA7076@mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 22:44:19 -0400
From: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
To: Marcin Miroslaw <spam_trap@...ekcja.mejor.pl>
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: fsck.ext4 -D corrupts fs?
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 10:13:14PM +0200, Marcin Miroslaw wrote:
> Hello,
> I've noticed fs curruption after using fsck.ext4 -D
Yeah, I really should get a new release of e2fsprogs out. It's fixed
in the maint branch.
- Ted
commit 16e470e65010ba3f0516cf9cdf1bd6c98f064e3f
Author: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Date: Sun Jul 19 22:43:33 2009 -0400
libext2fs: Fix regression in ext2fs_extent_set_bmap()
Commit 0dc291611 introduced a regression when unmapping the first
block in an extent. This caused e2fsck -fD to corrupt large
directories if the directory has to shrink by more than one block.
The problem was set_bmap should only go to a next leaf when setting a
first block in an extent, and not when it is unmapping the first block
in an extent.
Addresses-Debian-Bug: #537510
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
diff --git a/lib/ext2fs/extent.c b/lib/ext2fs/extent.c
index 7fcc2cf..9d7b7de 100644
--- a/lib/ext2fs/extent.c
+++ b/lib/ext2fs/extent.c
@@ -1296,11 +1296,12 @@ errcode_t ext2fs_extent_set_bmap(ext2_extent_handle_t handle,
}
if (retval)
goto done;
+ retval = ext2fs_extent_get(handle,
+ EXT2_EXTENT_NEXT_LEAF,
+ &extent);
+ if (retval)
+ goto done;
}
- retval = ext2fs_extent_get(handle, EXT2_EXTENT_NEXT_LEAF,
- &extent);
- if (retval)
- goto done;
extent.e_pblk++;
extent.e_lblk++;
extent.e_len--;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists