[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4AC38BBF.4080707@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 11:47:59 -0500
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
To: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
CC: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger@....com>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
Eric Sandeen <esandeen@...hat.com>,
Subrata Modak <subrata@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Updated fsx.c program (fixed fallocate)
Dave Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 10:32:37AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> > Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > > On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:39:38 -0600 Andreas Dilger wrote:
> > >
> > >> I've done some work to merge some of the existing fsx.c mods into a
> > >> single version. Over & above the version that is in the LTP, I've
> > >> included AKPM's O_DIRECT fixes (with a twist), the BSD mmap page and
> > >> segfault handling, and per-write fsync.
> > >
> > > It sure would be Good if fsx-linux had a fixed, known home, instead of
> > > having to look at Andrew's ext3-tools, Dave's codemonkey files,
> > > LTP, linux-fsdevel mailing list, etc.
> > >
> > > Is there a linux-fs-tests package somewhere? (like where the xfstests
> > > are being merged into)
> >
> > Well, I think Andreas' idea was to make LTP the official home for now
> > which is why I was going to send it here ...
> >
> > But I don't think xfstests is being merged into anything at the moment;
> > if anything, we're working to make it a more generic suite of tests (it
> > can run about 50 tests on generic posix filesystems by now).
>
> I'd love to see a tests/ directory shipped with the kernel.
> It's been talked about for about several years and still hasn't happened.
>
> Is it just because no-one has stepped up to do it ?
> I would be happy to manage a git tree for marshalling stuff on its way to Linus
> if that's all that's holding this idea back.
>
> Of course if there are other objections..
>
> Dave
>
Perhaps for simple, small things like fsx.c that might make sense, but a
full-blown test suite could add significantly to the size of the tarball
I'd think (especially by the time you start including things like
including pre-corrupted images, perhaps)...
-Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists