linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH 3/4 v2] code clean up for dio fallocate handling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 3 Nov 2009 21:20:46 -0500
From:	Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
To:	Mingming <cmm@...ibm.com>
Cc:	ext4 development <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
	Curt Wohlgemuth <curtw@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4 v2] code clean up for dio fallocate handling

On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 06:13:33PM -0700, Mingming wrote:
> ext4: code clean up for dio fallocate handling
> 
> The ext4_debug() call in ext4_end_io_dio() (inode.c) has a
> should be moved after checking the io_end structure to be not a NULL pointer.
> 
> The comment above ext4_get_block_dio_write() ("Maximum
> number of blocks...") is a duplicate; the original and correct comment
> is above the #define DIO_MAX_BLOCKS up above.
> 
> The check for allocated > max_blocks in ext4_split_unwritten_extents()
> can be removed, since the code returns immediately once allocated blocks is
> less or equals to the requested blocks to convert.
> 
> Based on review comments from Curt Wohlgemuth.
> 
> Signed-off-by:	Mingming Cao <cmm@...ibm.com>

The changes described last paragraph wasn't in the patch.  I assume it
was because patch #4 in this series changed:

	if (allocated <= max_blocks)

to:

	if (iblock == ee_block && allocated <= max_blocks)

I replaced the commit description with the following:


ext4: code clean up for dio fallocate handling

From: Mingming <cmm@...ibm.com>

The ext4_debug() call in ext4_end_io_dio() should be moved after the
check to make sure that io_end is non-NULL.

The comment above ext4_get_block_dio_write() ("Maximum number of
blocks...") is a duplicate; the original and correct comment is above
the #define DIO_MAX_BLOCKS up above.

Based on review comments from Curt Wohlgemuth.

Signed-off-by: Mingming Cao <cmm@...ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>

Added to the patch queue

						- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html