[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100318174629.GK8256@thunk.org>
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 13:46:29 -0400
From: tytso@....edu
To: jing zhang <zj.barak@...il.com>
Cc: linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger@....com>,
Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: memory leakage in ext4_discard_preallocations
> ext4_get_group_no_and_offset(sb, pa->pa_pstart, &group, NULL);
> @@ -3811,6 +3813,12 @@ repeat:
> list_del(&pa->u.pa_tmp_list);
> call_rcu(&(pa)->u.pa_rcu, ext4_mb_pa_callback);
> }
> + if (! list_empty(&list)) {
> + if (occurs++ < 2)
> + goto best_efforts;
> + else
> + BUG();
> + }
> if (ac)
> kmem_cache_free(ext4_ac_cachep, ac);
> }
Hmm, I'm not sure that BUG() is appropriate here. If there is an
I/O error reading the block bitmap, #1, retrying isn't going to help,
and #2, bringing down the entire system just because of an I/O error
in reading the block bitmap doesn't seem right.
Right now, if there is a problem, we just end up leaving the
preallocated list on the inode. Does that cause problems later on
down the line which you have observed?
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists