lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100416160856.GA25507@skl-net.de>
Date:	Fri, 16 Apr 2010 18:08:56 +0200
From:	Andre Noll <maan@...temlinux.org>
To:	Andrew Vasquez <andrew.vasquez@...gic.com>
Cc:	Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>,
	"linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Driver <Linux-Driver@...gic.com>,
	Thomas Helle <Helle@...bingen.mpg.de>
Subject: Re: ext4: (2.6.34-rc4): This should not happen!!  Data will be lost

On 08:52, Andrew Vasquez wrote:
> The driver here is simply reporting that the a command's timeout value
> had been exceeded and the mid-layer began error-recovery with a request
> to 'abort' the command.  The abort-request completed successfully:
> 
> 	qla2xxx 0000:06:09.0: scsi(0:0:0): Abort command issued -- 1 fa6a73 2002.
> 
> I can't explain why the storage did not complete the request in the
> allotted time.

Ah, that's valuable information, thanks. The underlying Infortrend
Raid System is rather old but worked without any problems for several
years. We recently replaced its 400G disks by new 2T WD disks. Maybe
the new disks have longer response times, could that be the reason? And
is there a way to increase the timeout value?

Andre
-- 
The only person who always got his work done by Friday was Robinson Crusoe

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (190 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ