[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100416163654.GD58339@plapa.qlogic.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 09:36:54 -0700
From: Andrew Vasquez <andrew.vasquez@...gic.com>
To: Andre Noll <maan@...temlinux.org>
CC: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>,
"linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Driver <Linux-Driver@...gic.com>,
Thomas Helle <Helle@...bingen.mpg.de>
Subject: Re: ext4: (2.6.34-rc4): This should not happen!! Data will be lost
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010, Andre Noll wrote:
> On 08:52, Andrew Vasquez wrote:
> > The driver here is simply reporting that the a command's timeout value
> > had been exceeded and the mid-layer began error-recovery with a request
> > to 'abort' the command. The abort-request completed successfully:
> >
> > qla2xxx 0000:06:09.0: scsi(0:0:0): Abort command issued -- 1 fa6a73 2002.
> >
> > I can't explain why the storage did not complete the request in the
> > allotted time.
>
> Ah, that's valuable information, thanks. The underlying Infortrend
> Raid System is rather old but worked without any problems for several
> years. We recently replaced its 400G disks by new 2T WD disks. Maybe
> the new disks have longer response times, could that be the reason? And
> is there a way to increase the timeout value?
To update the default timeout value (30 seconds) for commands
submitted to /dev/sdn to 60 seconds:
$ echo 60 > /sys/block/sdn/device/timeout
-- av
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists