[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100531124051.GA17262@lst.de>
Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 14:40:51 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: jack@...e.cz, tytso@....edu
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: nobh mount option in ext3/4?
ext3 and ext4 heave inherited the nobh option from ext2, but the
implementation is rather interesting. Except for the usual
option parsing / display it's only respected in
ext3_writeback_writepage/ext4_writepage and the truncate_page
implementation. Given that we don't take any more than usual
care to not create buffers heads during read this is not going
to effect a whole lot.
Is there a good reason to keep these options and the associated
code complexity? I'd be rather surprised if it gets any sufficient
testing..
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists