[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTimh4UjM3LWPjBjMA5UGecQYyPSxIvJBInijAP-j@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 09:02:57 +0800
From: shenghui <crosslonelyover@...il.com>
To: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@...e.de>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix return value for mb_cache_shrink_fn when nr_to_scan >
0
2010/7/20 Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@...e.de>:
> On Sunday 18 July 2010 08:36:59 Wang Sheng-Hui wrote:
>> I regenerated the patch. Please check it.
>
> The logic for calculating how many objects to free is still wrong:
> mb_cache_shrink_fn returns the number of entries scaled by
> sysctl_vfs_cache_pressure / 100. It should also scale nr_to_scan by the
> inverse of that. The sysctl_vfs_cache_pressure == 0 case (never scale) may
> require special attention.
>
> See dcache_shrinker() in fs/dcache.c.
>
> Thanks,
> Andreas
>
Sorry, I haven't found any special attention on
sysctl_vfs_cache_pressure == 0 case or scale
nr_to_scan in fs/dcache.c
900static int shrink_dcache_memory(int nr, gfp_t gfp_mask)
901{
902 if (nr) {
903 if (!(gfp_mask & __GFP_FS))
904 return -1;
905 prune_dcache(nr);
906 }
907 return (dentry_stat.nr_unused / 100) * sysctl_vfs_cache_pressure;
908}
--
Thanks and Best Regards,
shenghui
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists