[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTimBCrq8cPJrTSKiG_wbd1ppu0twTAMXeezJEZs3@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 09:04:46 +0800
From: shenghui <crosslonelyover@...il.com>
To: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@...e.de>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix return value for mb_cache_shrink_fn when nr_to_scan >
0
2010/7/20 shenghui <crosslonelyover@...il.com>:
> 2010/7/20 Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@...e.de>:
>
> Sorry, I haven't found any special attention on
> sysctl_vfs_cache_pressure == 0 case or scale
> nr_to_scan in fs/dcache.c
>
> 900static int shrink_dcache_memory(int nr, gfp_t gfp_mask)
> 901{
> 902 if (nr) {
> 903 if (!(gfp_mask & __GFP_FS))
> 904 return -1;
> 905 prune_dcache(nr);
> 906 }
> 907 return (dentry_stat.nr_unused / 100) * sysctl_vfs_cache_pressure;
> 908}
>
And for sysctl_vfs_cache_pressure == 0 case, it's
enough to return 0 to indicate no cache entries left.
--
Thanks and Best Regards,
shenghui
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists