lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1279721766.4818.39.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date:	Wed, 21 Jul 2010 10:16:06 -0400
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG] ext4 trace events cause NULL pointer dereferences

On Wed, 2010-07-21 at 22:31 +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> Hi Steven,

>         if (ac)
> 	        trace_ext4_mb_release_group_pa(ac, pa);
> 
> But, I don't think this is proper fix because we don't want any overhead
> if the tracepoint is disabled.
> 
> So, How do we check NULL in TP_fast_assign()?

You could do:

	TP_fast_assign(
		if (ac) {
	                __entry->dev            = ac->ac_sb->s_dev;
        	        __entry->ino            = ac->ac_inode->i_ino;
        	        __entry->pa_pstart      = pa->pa_pstart;
        	        __entry->pa_len         = pa->pa_len;
		}
        ),

But this just makes the __entry null and wastes the ring buffer.

I may be able to add a __discard_entry that may help. Then we could do
something like this:

	if (ac) {
                __entry->dev            = ac->ac_sb->s_dev;
                __entry->ino            = ac->ac_inode->i_ino;
                __entry->pa_pstart      = pa->pa_pstart;
                __entry->pa_len         = pa->pa_len;
	} else
		__discard_entry;

Does this seem reasonable?

But for now, the wasting the entry seems to be the only choice we have,
or to do as you suggested and have the "if (ac) trace_...", but I don't
like that.

-- Steve



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ