linux-ext4 - Re: [BUG] ext4 trace events cause NULL pointer dereferences

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100721142112.GB5764@nowhere>
Date:	Wed, 21 Jul 2010 16:21:16 +0200
From:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
	Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG] ext4 trace events cause NULL pointer dereferences

On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 10:16:06AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-07-21 at 22:31 +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> > Hi Steven,
> 
> >         if (ac)
> > 	        trace_ext4_mb_release_group_pa(ac, pa);
> > 
> > But, I don't think this is proper fix because we don't want any overhead
> > if the tracepoint is disabled.
> > 
> > So, How do we check NULL in TP_fast_assign()?
> 
> You could do:
> 
> 	TP_fast_assign(
> 		if (ac) {
> 	                __entry->dev            = ac->ac_sb->s_dev;
>         	        __entry->ino            = ac->ac_inode->i_ino;
>         	        __entry->pa_pstart      = pa->pa_pstart;
>         	        __entry->pa_len         = pa->pa_len;
> 		}
>         ),
> 
> But this just makes the __entry null and wastes the ring buffer.
> 
> I may be able to add a __discard_entry that may help. Then we could do
> something like this:
> 
> 	if (ac) {
>                 __entry->dev            = ac->ac_sb->s_dev;
>                 __entry->ino            = ac->ac_inode->i_ino;
>                 __entry->pa_pstart      = pa->pa_pstart;
>                 __entry->pa_len         = pa->pa_len;
> 	} else
> 		__discard_entry;
> 
> Does this seem reasonable?
> 
> But for now, the wasting the entry seems to be the only choice we have,
> or to do as you suggested and have the "if (ac) trace_...", but I don't
> like that.
> 
> -- Steve


Is there no already existing branch in ext4 you could reuse in order to
send the trace only if (ac) ?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html