[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100805211758.GA12358@thunk.org>
Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2010 17:17:58 -0400
From: Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To: Vladislav Bolkhovitin <vst@...b.net>
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Crash after umount'ing a disconnected disk (Re: extfs
reliability)
On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 11:29:59PM +0400, Vladislav Bolkhovitin wrote:
> >Have you had a chance to check out whether this patch solves the
> >problem you were complaining with respect to yanking out the last
> >iSCSI or FC link to a hard drive, and then umounting the disk
> >afterwards?
>
> Looks like it works. I was able to reach that branch (see AAA in the
> attached log) and it was handled well.
OK, great!
> I've also got other (see the attached log file):
>
> 1. A bunch of detected hung tasks with call traces.
>
Is this unique to ext4? It looks like a problem where we're either
(a) not getting an I/O error from the block device in time before we
get the hung task timeout (which might be the right thing, if the link
eventually comes back --- what I've seen is there's a no clear
consensus how long the last FC or iSCSI link should be done before we
give up on an I/O operation), or (b) for some reason we're not
noticing the I/O error and waiting forever. I believe (a) is more
likely here, but it's possible it's (b). Do you eventually get file
system I/O errors that abort the journal transaction? You should...
> 2. "JBD: recovery failed" I reported before.
I've searched my mail archives, and I'm not sure what you're talking
about here. Maybe this was in an e-mail that you sent that perhaps
got lost?
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists