linux-ext4 - Raid FFSB Benchmark results for 2.6.35-rc5

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1281121633.7357.26.camel@keith-laptop>
Date:	Fri, 06 Aug 2010 12:07:13 -0700
From:	Keith Mannthey <kmannth@...ibm.com>
To:	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Raid FFSB Benchmark results for 2.6.35-rc5

This is a collection of benchmark runs with the FFSB test suite. The
results are comparable to other raid results on the boxacle server. 

The latest results can be found at: 
http://btrfs.boxacle.net/repository/raid/2.6.35-rc5/2.6.35-rc5/2.6.35-rc5.html

I added XFS without barriers and EXT3 with barriers into the mix since
my last data set. 

In general things look about the same.  There are a few cases where ext4
with barriers (default) has gotten better but ext4 without barriers has
gotten worse. 

Thanks,
  Keith Mannthey 
  LTC Local FileSystem 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html