linux-ext4 - Re: Raid FFSB Benchmark results for 2.6.35-rc5

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100806191439.GD24583@thunk.org>
Date:	Fri, 6 Aug 2010 15:14:39 -0400
From:	Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To:	Keith Mannthey <kmannth@...ibm.com>
Cc:	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Raid FFSB Benchmark results for 2.6.35-rc5

On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 12:07:13PM -0700, Keith Mannthey wrote:
> This is a collection of benchmark runs with the FFSB test suite. The
> results are comparable to other raid results on the boxacle server. 
> 
> The latest results can be found at: 
> http://btrfs.boxacle.net/repository/raid/2.6.35-rc5/2.6.35-rc5/2.6.35-rc5.html
> 
> I added XFS without barriers and EXT3 with barriers into the mix since
> my last data set. 

Thanks, it's good to know there haven't been any major regression on
the ext4 side.

If you could have a chance to run a set of benchmark runs with the
jbd2 scalability patches, I'd be hugely interested to see how much
difference they make.

Thanks again!

						- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html