lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <25B374CC0D9DFB4698BB331F82CD0CF20D5FE3@wdscexbe08.sc.wdc.com>
Date:	Sat, 16 Oct 2010 17:16:50 -0700
From:	"Daniel Taylor" <Daniel.Taylor@....com>
To:	<linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: ext over RAID-[56]?

One of the program managers here asked me a question that I couldn't answer:

with ext[34] over a RAID-[56] volume, what protection against data
corruption
and loss of existing data does the file system provide for the case of an
incomplete update of the RAID "stripe"?

I know that anyone with any usable brain cells has their data server on a
nice
UPS, but not all customers are so equipped, and he's concerned about
corruption
during a power failure (loss of unwritten data is OK).

I can't see any configuration options that would help but I could easily be
missing something.  Any ideas?

Thanks,

Dan Taylor
Sr. Staff Engineer
WD Branded Products
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ