lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sun, 17 Oct 2010 12:38:49 +0200
From:	"Amir G." <amir73il@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To:	Daniel Taylor <Daniel.Taylor@....com>
Cc:	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ext over RAID-[56]?

On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 2:16 AM, Daniel Taylor <Daniel.Taylor@....com> wrote:
> One of the program managers here asked me a question that I couldn't answer:
>
> with ext[34] over a RAID-[56] volume, what protection against data
> corruption
> and loss of existing data does the file system provide for the case of an
> incomplete update of the RAID "stripe"?
>
> I know that anyone with any usable brain cells has their data server on a
> nice
> UPS, but not all customers are so equipped, and he's concerned about
> corruption
> during a power failure (loss of unwritten data is OK).
>
> I can't see any configuration options that would help but I could easily be
> missing something.  Any ideas?
>

I don't think you are missing something. check out this article:
http://lwn.net/Articles/349970/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ