lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <68AB6BC2-4F3F-46E6-AF17-E26FCB03EE9D@dilger.ca> Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 16:40:41 -0700 From: Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca> To: Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu> Cc: Ric Wheeler <rwheeler@...hat.com>, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, ext4 development <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ext2: speed up file creates by optimizing rec_len functions On 2010-12-10, at 10:55, Ted Ts'o wrote: > On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 08:06:25PM -0500, Ric Wheeler wrote: >> If we could get rid of ext2 (and eventually ext3), it would actually >> help reduce the testing matrix and possibly let us invest even more >> in testing ext4. Having to maintain three very similar code bases >> and test them all for correctness and performance is a real pain :) > > A distribution can do that at any time, just by unconfiguring > CONFIG_EXT2 and/or CONFIG_EXT3 and configuring > CONFIG_EXT4_USE_FOR_EXT23. :-) That doesn't get rid of the maintenance efforts, however. There are a constant stream of "patch for ext[234] needs to be ported to ext[342]". Cheers, Andreas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists