[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D02C4D8.3040704@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 18:24:56 -0600
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
To: Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>
CC: "Ted Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, Ric Wheeler <rwheeler@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
ext4 development <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ext2: speed up file creates by optimizing rec_len
functions
On 12/10/10 5:40 PM, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> On 2010-12-10, at 10:55, Ted Ts'o wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 08:06:25PM -0500, Ric Wheeler wrote:
>>> If we could get rid of ext2 (and eventually ext3), it would actually
>>> help reduce the testing matrix and possibly let us invest even more
>>> in testing ext4. Having to maintain three very similar code bases
>>> and test them all for correctness and performance is a real pain :)
>>
>> A distribution can do that at any time, just by unconfiguring
>> CONFIG_EXT2 and/or CONFIG_EXT3 and configuring
>> CONFIG_EXT4_USE_FOR_EXT23. :-)
>
> That doesn't get rid of the maintenance efforts, however. There are a
> constant stream of "patch for ext[234] needs to be ported to ext[342]".
Agreed....
our 3-way fork is getting cumbersome.
> Cheers, Andreas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists