[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110511170317.GM5057@quack.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 19:03:17 +0200
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...ibm.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Rewrite ext4_page_mkwrite, fix fs freezing
On Wed 11-05-11 09:48:36, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 11:27:52AM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > On Tue 10-05-11 20:30:12, Ted Tso wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 12:29:31AM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > >
> > > > following three patches reimplement ext4_page_mkwrite() so that it returns
> > > > locked pages (which is necessary for stable pages work and also for fixing of
> > > > freezing code). As a bonus we also avoid taking i_alloc_sem as it's not
> > > > necessary and use generic block_page_mkwrite() helper. The common delalloc
> > > > path should be more straightforward now.
> > >
> > > How does this relate to Darrick Wong's patches? Are your patches in
> > > addition to or instead of his?
> > It's in addition to those (although with my patches, a generic change to
> > block_page_mkwrite() would be enough for ext4). If you plan to merge those
> > now, I can rediff on top of those patches.
>
> Just to be clear, your new __block_page_mkwrite still needs a patch to call
> wait_on_page_writeback to provide stable page writes, correct?
Correct.
> I think we'd still need a wait_on_page_writeback for the "all buffers are
> mapped" VM_FAULT_LOCKED exit from ext4_page_mkwrite?
Ah, right, I forgot about that one.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists