[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110517150903.GA6653@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 11:09:03 -0400
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: Ted Tso <tytso@....edu>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] fs: Create __block_page_mkwrite() helper passing
error values back
> + if (unlikely(ret < 0))
> unlock_page(page);
> + else
> ret = VM_FAULT_LOCKED;
> out:
> return ret;
Using two different types of return values here seems rather unclean.
I'd rather use 0 instead of VM_FAULT_LOCKED here, and maybe overload
-EAGAIN for VM_FAULT_NOPAGE.
> +int block_page_mkwrite(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct vm_fault *vmf,
> + get_block_t get_block)
> +{
> + int ret = __block_page_mkwrite(vma, vmf, get_block);
> +
> + if (unlikely(ret < 0)) {
> + if (ret == -ENOMEM)
> + return VM_FAULT_OOM;
> + /* -ENOSPC, -EIO, etc */
> + return VM_FAULT_SIGBUS;
> + }
> + return ret;
and maybe also add a small inlined block_page_mkwrite_error helper
to translate the values.
Alternatively it might make sense to add a VM_FAULT_ENOSPC return value
so that you could re-use block_page_mkwrite unmodified, and we could
also have better error reporting for that case for the core VM.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists