[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BANLkTinLRiRakANN-VqEr8mcTdxyT1SGm2oMgKufcnbk=dKnVQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 17:44:58 -0700
From: Eric Gouriou <egouriou@...gle.com>
To: Robin Dong <hao.bigrat@...il.com>
Cc: djwong@...ibm.com, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
Robin Dong <sanbai@...bao.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ext4: avoid redundant cache finding if flags not
cantian PUNCH_OUT
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 12:59, Darrick J. Wong <djwong@...ibm.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 06:45:13PM +0800, Robin Dong wrote:
>> Subject: [PATCH v2] ext4: avoid redundant cache finding if flags not cantian
>
> I suspect you mean "contain" as opposed to "cantian".
The patch summary line could also use some shortening.
>> In old code, ext4 will find extent in cache first even flags does
>> not contian PUNCH_OUT, that may waste some time.
>
> Same here ("contian").
How about something along the lines of:
---------
ext4: avoid wasted extent cache lookup if !PUNCH_OUT_EXT
This patch avoids an extraneous lookup of the extent cache
in ext4_ext_map_blocks() when the flag
EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_PUNCH_OUT_EXT is absent.
The existing logic was performing the lookup but not making
use of the result. The patch simply reverses the order of evaluation
in the condition.
Since ext4_ext_in_cache() does not initialize newex on misses, bypassing
its invocation does not introduce any new issue in this regard.
---------
Regards - Eric
>
> --D
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Robin Dong <sanbai@...bao.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>
>> ---
>> fs/ext4/extents.c | 4 ++--
>> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c
>> index eb63c7b..fed2633 100644
>> --- a/fs/ext4/extents.c
>> +++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c
>> @@ -3358,8 +3358,8 @@ int ext4_ext_map_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
>> trace_ext4_ext_map_blocks_enter(inode, map->m_lblk, map->m_len, flags);
>>
>> /* check in cache */
>> - if (ext4_ext_in_cache(inode, map->m_lblk, &newex) &&
>> - ((flags & EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_PUNCH_OUT_EXT) == 0)) {
>> + if (!(flags & EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_PUNCH_OUT_EXT) &&
>> + ext4_ext_in_cache(inode, map->m_lblk, &newex)) {
>> if (!newex.ee_start_lo && !newex.ee_start_hi) {
>> if ((flags & EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CREATE) == 0) {
>> /*
>> --
>> 1.7.1
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists