lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <341DAA96EE3A8444B6E4657BE8A846EA4B3DA12708@NDJSSCC06.ndc.nasa.gov>
Date:	Tue, 28 Jun 2011 13:37:29 -0500
From:	"Mccauliff, Sean D. (ARC-PX)[Lockheed Martin Space OPNS]" 
	<sean.d.mccauliff@...a.gov>
To:	"Ted Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
CC:	"linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: High CPU Utilization When Copying to Ext4

 uname -a
Linux sasr200-2.arc.nasa.gov 2.6.38.7-30.fc15.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri May 27 05:15:53 UTC 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

There are about 10M files.  Many are small.  There are about 2M files that are sparse files.  It's hen the copy program gets to these files that the cpu usage gets very high.  There are no links of any kind.

The copy program is written in Java, but uses the fiemap to get the logical address ranges that have actually been allocated.  It merges any contiguous logical address ranges when it reads and writes to the new file.

The copy has completed.  This is a snipped from top I had saved.  This machine has 4 cores and 8G of ram.  There are 32 threads doing copies.  At any time each has a directory to itself.

    % cpu
0573 root 20 0 7574m 1.9g 1356 S 204.3 24.9 3054:22 java
27702 root 20 0 0 0 0 R 70.5 0.0 689:01.73 flush-253:2
22467 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 22.6 0.0 7:55.98 kworker/3:1
22351 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 21.6 0.0 9:42.58 kworker/1:3
22686 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 21.3 0.0 0:26.19 kworker/2:0
22679 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 13.8 0.0 0:29.14 kworker/0:1
   38 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 9.2 0.0 91:21.19 kswapd0
22700 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 7.9 0.0 0:04.64 kworker/0:0
10566 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 3.6 0.0 17:14.77 jbd2/dm-2-8 

If I remember correctly top said that: 97% of time was sys time.  So even the time used by Java was still almost all kernel time.    Only a few megabytes was actually swapped.

Thanks,
Sean




________________________________________
From: Ted Ts'o [tytso@....edu]
Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2011 8:05 PM
To: Mccauliff, Sean D. (ARC-PX)[Lockheed Martin Space OPNS]
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: High CPU Utilization When Copying to Ext4

On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 12:33:16PM -0500, Mccauliff, Sean D. (ARC-PX)[Lockheed Martin Space OPNS] wrote:
> Sorry if this is not the correct mailing list for ext4 questions.

-ext3-users, +linux-ext4

> I'm copying terabytes of data from an ext3 file system to a new ext4
> file system.  I'm seeing high CPU usage from the processes
> flush-253:2, kworker-3:0, kworker-2:2, kworker-1:1, and kworker-0:0.
> Does anyone on the list have any idea what these processes do, why
> they are consuming so much cpu time and if there is something that
> can be done about it?  This is using Fedora 15.

You're using Fedora 15, so you're using a 2.6.38 kernel, right?

How are you copying the files?  Are you using cp?  rsync?  NFS?  CIFS?

what sort of files are you copying?  Are they large files, many of
small files?   Are there lots of hard links?  etc.

                                      - Ted


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ