lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 16 Aug 2011 12:15:53 +0800
From:	Tao Ma <tm@....ma>
To:	Jiaying Zhang <jiayingz@...gle.com>
CC:	Michael Tokarev <mjt@....msk.ru>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
	sandeen@...hat.com, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: DIO process stuck apparently due to dioread_nolock (3.0)

Hi Jiaying,
On 08/16/2011 07:53 AM, Jiaying Zhang wrote:
> Hi Michael,
> 
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 1:56 AM, Michael Tokarev <mjt@....msk.ru> wrote:
>> 15.08.2011 12:00, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>> [....]
>>
>> So, it looks like this (starting with cold cache):
>>
>> 1. rename the redologs and copy them over - this will
>>   make a hot copy of redologs
>> 2. startup oracle - it will complain that the redologs aren't
>>   redologs, the header is corrupt
>> 3. shut down oracle, start it up again - it will succeed.
>>
>> If between 1 and 2 you'll issue sync(1) everything will work.
>> When shutting down, oracle calls fsync(), so that's like
>> sync(1) again.
>>
>> If there will be some time between 1. and 2., everything
>> will work too.
>> 
>> Without dioread_nolock I can't trigger the problem no matter
>> how I tried.
>>
>>
>> A smaller test case.  I used redo1.odf file (one of the
>> redologs) as a test file, any will work.
>>
>>  $ cp -p redo1.odf temp
>>  $ dd if=temp of=foo iflag=direct count=20
> Isn't this the expected behavior here? When doing
> 'cp -p redo1.odf temp', data is copied to temp through
> buffer write, but there is no guarantee when data will be
> actually written to disk. Then with 'dd if=temp of=foo
> iflag=direct count=20', data is read directly from disk.
> Very likely, the written data hasn't been flushed to disk
> yet so ext4 returns zero in this case.
Sorry, but it doesn't sound correct to me.
Say we use a buffer write to a file and then use direct i/o read, what
we expect(or at least Michael expect) is that we use read the updated
data, not the stale one. I thought of a tiny race window in ext4 here,
but need to do some test to verify and then fix it.

Thanks
Tao
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists