[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E4A0AFA.7090403@tao.ma>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 14:15:22 +0800
From: Tao Ma <tm@....ma>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
CC: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, mjt@....msk.ru
Subject: Re: DIO process stuck apparently due to dioread_nolock (3.0)
Hi Eric,
On 08/16/2011 12:08 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 8/13/11 11:02 AM, Tao Ma wrote:
>> From: Tao Ma <boyu.mt@...bao.com>
>>
>> Hi Michael,
>> could you please check whether this patch work for you?
>
> Thanks, this is the patch I meant to send, I guess ;) I think
> I missed the "|=" case before :(
>
> given that every place we set it requires a test and an increment
> if not set, maybe a helper to do all that is in order?
I have decided to leave it to the next merge window. So I will re-send
this patch as a fix and then create another patch for the helper
generalization.
Thanks
Tao
>
> -Eric
>
>>
>> Subject: [PATCH] ext4: Set unwritten flag and increase i_aiodio_unwritten simultaneously.
>> From 4f1d797973da8b5cf79f58cc1e4d22efb9d46d19 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Tao Ma <boyu.mt@...bao.com>
>> Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 23:50:28 +0800
>> Subject: [PATCH] ext4: Set unwritten flag and increase i_aiodio_unwritten simultaneously.
>>
>> EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN flag set and the increase of i_aiodio_unwritten should
>> be done simultaneously since ext4_end_io_nolock always clear the flag and
>> decrease the counter in the same time.
>>
>> We don't increase i_aiodio_unwritten when setting EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN so
>> it will go nagative and causes some process to wait forever.
>>
>> Part of the patch came from Eric in his e-mail.
>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-ext4&m=131316851417460&w=2
>>
>> Reported-by: Michael Tokarev<mjt@....msk.ru>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Tao Ma <boyu.mt@...bao.com>
>> ---
>> fs/ext4/inode.c | 9 ++++++++-
>> fs/ext4/page-io.c | 6 ++++--
>> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
>> index d47264c..40c0b10 100644
>> --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
>> +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
>> @@ -2668,8 +2668,15 @@ static void ext4_end_io_buffer_write(struct buffer_head *bh, int uptodate)
>> goto out;
>> }
>>
>> - io_end->flag = EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN;
>> + /*
>> + * It may be over-defensive here to check EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN now,
>> + * but being more careful is always safe for the future change.
>> + */
>> inode = io_end->inode;
>> + if (!(io_end->flag & EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN)) {
>> + io_end->flag |= EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN;
>> + atomic_inc(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_aiodio_unwritten);
>> + }
>>
>> /* Add the io_end to per-inode completed io list*/
>> spin_lock_irqsave(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_completed_io_lock, flags);
>> diff --git a/fs/ext4/page-io.c b/fs/ext4/page-io.c
>> index 430c401..78839af 100644
>> --- a/fs/ext4/page-io.c
>> +++ b/fs/ext4/page-io.c
>> @@ -334,8 +334,10 @@ submit_and_retry:
>> if ((io_end->num_io_pages >= MAX_IO_PAGES) &&
>> (io_end->pages[io_end->num_io_pages-1] != io_page))
>> goto submit_and_retry;
>> - if (buffer_uninit(bh))
>> - io->io_end->flag |= EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN;
>> + if (buffer_uninit(bh) && !(io_end->flag & EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN)) {
>> + io_end->flag |= EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN;
>> + atomic_inc(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_aiodio_unwritten);
>> + }
>> io->io_end->size += bh->b_size;
>> io->io_next_block++;
>> ret = bio_add_page(io->io_bio, bh->b_page, bh->b_size, bh_offset(bh));
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists