[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111025081834.GB31921@thunk.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 04:18:34 -0400
From: Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@...nvz.org>
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, achender@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] ext4: Do not clear EOFBLOCKS_FL too soon
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 01:08:56AM +0400, Dmitry Monakhov wrote:
> ext4_ext_insert_extent() may fail due to number of reasons (ENOSPC)
> so let's update eof flag only after extent was successfully inserted.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@...nvz.org>
The problem with this patch is that if the check_eofblocks_fl() fails,
the patch jumps to out: and doesn't undo the block allocation and
extent tree manipulation.
I suspect a better way of solving this problem is to keep the existing
order, but to save the state of eofblocks flag, and if
ext4_ext_insert_extent() fails, to restore the state of the eofblocks
flag before jumping to the exit routine.
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists