linux-ext4 - Re: [WIP 11/18] Basic support (faulting) for huge pages for shmfs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120217144118.GB19606@thunk.org>
Date:	Fri, 17 Feb 2012 09:41:18 -0500
From:	Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To:	Radosław Smogura <mail@...gura.eu>
Cc:	linux-mm@...ck.org, Yongqiang Yang <xiaoqiangnk@...il.com>,
	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [WIP 11/18] Basic support (faulting) for huge pages for shmfs

On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 03:12:44PM +0100, Radosław Smogura wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 18:42:33 -0500, Ted Ts'o wrote:
> >OK, stupid question... where are patches 1 through 10?  I'm guessing
> >linux-ext4 wasn't cc'ed on them?
> >
> >					- Ted
> Actually, I added those for --cc (checked in command history). I
> think problems went from mail server, it first sent 10 first
> patches, then no more, after 20 min I resented patches from 11, but
> after few hours some "not sent" patches were sent (I putted self to
> cc, so I know). Now, I see those at
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-ext4/.

Ok, so there's no difference between the patches sent yesterday with
"WIP" in the subject line, and the ones which didn't?  It was just a
resend, then, correct?

      	     	     	       	   	- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html