linux-ext4 - Re: [WIP 11/18] Basic support (faulting) for huge pages for shmfs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f78370f3c3fefc9b89c44522f874730d@rsmogura.net>
Date:	Fri, 17 Feb 2012 15:51:11 +0100
From:	Radosław Smogura <mail@...gura.eu>
To:	Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Cc:	<linux-mm@...ck.org>, Yongqiang Yang <xiaoqiangnk@...il.com>,
	<linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [WIP 11/18] Basic support (faulting) for huge pages for shmfs

On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 09:41:18 -0500, Ted Ts'o wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 03:12:44PM +0100, Radosław Smogura wrote:
>> On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 18:42:33 -0500, Ted Ts'o wrote:
>> >OK, stupid question... where are patches 1 through 10?  I'm 
>> guessing
>> >linux-ext4 wasn't cc'ed on them?
>> >
>> >					- Ted
>> Actually, I added those for --cc (checked in command history). I
>> think problems went from mail server, it first sent 10 first
>> patches, then no more, after 20 min I resented patches from 11, but
>> after few hours some "not sent" patches were sent (I putted self to
>> cc, so I know). Now, I see those at
>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-ext4/.
>
> Ok, so there's no difference between the patches sent yesterday with
> "WIP" in the subject line, and the ones which didn't?  It was just a
> resend, then, correct?
>
>       	     	     	       	   	- Ted
Yes, indeed.
Regards
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html