[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120310052231.GD5652@thunk.org>
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 00:22:31 -0500
From: Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...ibm.com>
Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
Sunil Mushran <sunil.mushran@...cle.com>,
Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Mingming Cao <cmm@...ibm.com>,
Joel Becker <jlbec@...lplan.org>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
Coly Li <colyli@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 29/54] e2fsck: Check extended attribute block checksums
On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 04:00:32PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> diff --git a/e2fsck/problem.c b/e2fsck/problem.c
> index d910629..ad6887e 100644
> --- a/e2fsck/problem.c
> +++ b/e2fsck/problem.c
> @@ -961,6 +961,21 @@ static struct e2fsck_problem problem_table[] = {
> "extent\n\t(logical @b %c, @n physical @b %b, len %N)\n"),
> PROMPT_FIX, 0 },
>
> + /* Extended attribute block checksum for inode does not match. */
> + { PR_1_EA_BLOCK_CSUM_INVALID,
> + N_("Extended attribute @a @b %b checksum for @i %i does not "
> + "match. "),
> + PROMPT_CLEAR, 0 },
> +
> + /*
> + * Extended attribute block passes checks, but checksum for inode does
> + * not match.
> + */
> + { PR_1_EA_BLOCK_CSUM_INVALID,
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
This should be PR_1_EA_BLOCK_ONLY_CSUM_INVALID. This was discovered
again via the tst_problem unit test in the e2fsprogs regression test
suite:
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=../lib DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH=../lib ./tst_problem
*** Duplicate in problem table:
curr code = 0x0001006a: Extended attribute @a @b %b passes checks, but checksum for @i %i does not match.
*** prev code = 0x0001006a: Extended attribute @a @b %b checksum for @i %i does not match.
*** This is a fatal programming error in e2fsck
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists