linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH 2/9] ext4: Use pr_fmt and pr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120320130325.GG14363@thunk.org>
Date:	Tue, 20 Mar 2012 09:03:25 -0400
From:	Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu, joe@...ches.com, anca.emanuel@...il.com,
	adilger.kernel@...ger.ca, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] ext4: Use pr_fmt and pr_<level>

On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 03:10:01AM -0400, David Miller wrote:
> > OK. Say I'm a scraper.  How do I distinguish between:
> > 
> > pr_info("foo");
> > printk(KERN_INFO "foo");
> > 
> > Oh my. seems that both result in exactly the same thing ending up in the
> > dmesg buffer
> 
> No it doesn't result in the same output, read the definitions again.
> 
> pr_info can be influenced by pr_fmt, plain printk cannot

But if you don't use pr_fmt, it's the same.  And even if you do, then
pr_info() is the same as printk(KERN_INFO pr_fmt ...).  For a device
driver where cut and paste reuse happens, sure, it's handy.  But for
the rest of the kernel, it doesn't really buy you anything.  

And as I've said, something like ext4_msg(sb, ...) is **far** more
useful.  I don't need a 1200-line patch that messes with debug
printk's that are #ifdef'ed out.

     	   	     	  	       	       - Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html