linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH v1 0/9] do not use s

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1333374418.22146.5.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com>
Date:	Mon, 02 Apr 2012 16:46:58 +0300
From:	Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>
To:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc:	Ted Tso <tytso@....edu>,
	Ext4 Mailing List <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux FS Maling List <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Maling List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/9] do not use s_dirt in ext4

On Sat, 2012-03-31 at 13:49 +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > Well, I ran vanilla the tests in vanilla 3.3 overnight, they were fine.
> > But may be I was lucky. I'll try to run the tests with vanilla kernel
> > some more. I mean, it would make more sense to report something against
> > vanilla 3.3, not a patched 3.3.
>   That's true. Frankly I think you were lucky with hitting the bug with
> patched kernel rather than not hitting it with vanilla :). What test did
> you run exactly?

I've sent a separate report (Subject: 3.3 oops). The oops there is a bit
different comparing to this one, though. For this oops I used the same
kvm setup.

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)