lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1333374249.22146.2.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2012 16:44:09 +0300
From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: Ext4 Mailing List <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux FS Maling List <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Maling List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] ext2: write superblock only once on unmount
On Sat, 2012-03-31 at 13:53 +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Wed 21-03-12 18:14:30, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> > From: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@...ux.intel.com>
> >
> > Currently on unmount if we are mounted R/W, we first write the superblock to
> > the media if it is dirty, and then write it again, which is not optimal. This
> > patch makes ext2 write the superblock on unmount less times.
> Looks good. I've added the patch to my tree.
I would like to test v2 against your tree, I found this one:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jack/linux-fs.git
but I do not see this patch there - is that the right tree, or may be
you did not push out? Which branch should I use?
Thanks!
--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists